Showing posts with label US Monetary Policy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label US Monetary Policy. Show all posts

Friday, October 3, 2014

Dont Be Fooled.

Don’t Be Fooled

Last week it was reported that the US economy grew by 4.6% during the second quarter. But don’t be fooled. The US economy is far weaker than that headline number suggests. In large part, the second quarter was strong because the first quarter was so weak. In that quarter, GDP contracted by -2.1%. During the first six months of 2014, the economy grew by only 0.6%, which translates into an annualized rate of only 1.2%. To put that into perspective, take a look at the following chart, which shows the US GDP growth numbers going back to 1980. There were only six years out of the past 34 when the economic performance of the Unites States was worse than it was during the first half of this year.

OK. It’s true that the very harsh winter caused the economy to be particularly weak at the beginning of this year. Therefore, it is almost certain that the economy will be considerably stronger during the second half of the year than it was during the first. Nevertheless, it is clear that the economy is suffering from something more than just cold weather.

Notice how much more slowly the economy has been growing during this decade than in the past. The economy grew by an average annual rate of 3.2% during the 1980s and the 1990s. So far during this decade, it has expanded by an average annual rate of only 2.0% - despite the massive government life support infusions it has received since the global economic crisis began. Over the last five and a half year, the budget deficit has exceeded $6 trillion, the Fed has injected $3.5 trillion of newly created money into the financial markets and the Federal Funds rate has been held at zero percent. That kind of stimulus should have created an economic boom of the first degree. That fact that it didn’t should serve as a warning that something is very fundamentally wrong with the US economy.

The financial markets have chosen to ignore the economy’s fundamental weakness and, instead, have seized on the strong second quarter GDP number as proof that the long-awaited US economic recovery is, at last, upon us. This belief, combined with the approaching end of the third round of Quantitative Easing and weak economic numbers out of Europe and Japan, have produced a meaningful bull market in the US dollar. Over the last couple of months, the dollar has gained 7% to 8% against both the Euro and the Yen.

This big move in the dollar is starting to have interesting implications. First, when the dollar strengthens, commodity prices (including the price of gold and silver) tend to weaken. That is what we are seeing now. The Thomson Reuters CRB Commodity Index, which measures a basket of commodities has fallen 10% since July. Many commodities are already under pressure due to either a surge in new supply (oil, corn, wheat) or weakening demand from China (most metals). Consequently, the currencies of the commodity-producing countries (such as Australia and Brazil) are taking a hit.

This strong dollar trend may continue for some time. If it does, some really exciting investment opportunities could arise. The market consensus view is that the Fed is going to stop its program of Quantitative Easing just as the European Central Bank launches one in Europe and the Bank Of Japan accelerates its Yen printing program in Japan. So long as this remains the consensus view, the downward pressure on the price of gold, silver, most other commodities and the currencies of the commodity-producing countries could continue until they are all considerably oversold.

The strong dollar trend is built on the belief that the US economy will become stronger as we move into 2015. I believe this view is mistaken. With QE 3 ending later this month, the US stock market is likely to experience a significant correction between now and next spring. When it does, the US economy will weaken again and that will cause the dollar to fall.

In that scenario, where the US economy moves back toward recession, the global demand for commodities would also weaken. Therefore, while commodity prices would benefit from a weaker dollar, they would suffer from reduced global demand. Global deflationary pressures would probably intensify.

What would happen after that would depend on the central banks. Ultimately, I believe the Fed will have to return as the Printer-Of-Last-Resort and launch he fourth round of Quantitative Easing on an aggressive scale. If I am right, when QE 4 is announced, the dollar will weaken further, while the price of old, silver, most other commodities, and the currencies of the commodity-producing countries would all rebound sharply.

As they say, timing is everything. Getting the timing right on these moves in currencies and commodities is going to be tricky. But, don’t allow yourself to be fooled. The US economy is much weaker than the second quarter GDP number would suggest. Therefore, the current strong dollar trend, while is could last for some time, is not underpinned by strong foundations.

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Fed: low interest rate until 2014

Release Date: January 25, 2012

For immediate release

Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in December suggests that the economy has been expanding moderately, notwithstanding some slowing in global growth. While indicators point to some further improvement in overall labor market conditions, the unemployment rate remains elevated. Household spending has continued to advance, but growth in business fixed investment has slowed, and the housing sector remains depressed. Inflation has been subdued in recent months, and longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable.

Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The Committee expects economic growth over coming quarters to be modest and consequently anticipates that the unemployment rate will decline only gradually toward levels that the Committee judges to be consistent with its dual mandate. Strains in global financial markets continue to pose significant downside risks to the economic outlook. The Committee also anticipates that over coming quarters, inflation will run at levels at or below those consistent with the Committee's dual mandate.

To support a stronger economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time, is at levels consistent with the dual mandate, the Committee expects to maintain a highly accommodative stance for monetary policy. In particular, the Committee decided today to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and currently anticipates that economic conditions--including low rates of resource utilization and a subdued outlook for inflation over the medium run--are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate at least through late 2014.

The Committee also decided to continue its program to extend the average maturity of its holdings of securities as announced in September. The Committee is maintaining its existing policies of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities and of rolling over maturing Treasury securities at auction. The Committee will regularly review the size and composition of its securities holdings and is prepared to adjust those holdings as appropriate to promote a stronger economic recovery in a context of price stability.

Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman; Elizabeth A. Duke; Dennis P. Lockhart; Sandra Pianalto; Sarah Bloom Raskin; Daniel K. Tarullo; John C. Williams; and Janet L. Yellen. Voting against the action was Jeffrey M. Lacker, who preferred to omit the description of the time period over which economic conditions are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate.